Implementation gap between the Energy Community and the European Union is widening, says report
The Energy Community has fallen behind the EU in the implementation of the Energy Community acquis communitaire, and this gap has widened last year, reads an Annual Implementation Report published by the Energy Community Secretariat on Wednesday.
The document assesses the progress achieved by the Contracting Parties in implementing the Energy Community acquis communitaire in the period from September 2012 to September 2013. The report will be taken into account by the European Commission when it draws up the Progress Report on the candidatecountries andpotential candidates to joint the EU (the event is scheduled for October 16, 2013).
“Without meaningful reform of the electricity and gas markets and progress in regional market integration, the gap between the Energy Community Contracting Parties and the EU will continue to widen. The EU is moving ahead at a faster pace than before in order to meet its 2014 target date for completing the EU internal energy market,” said Energy Community Secretariat Director Janez Kopac.
The report showed that the level of progress made in the implementation of the acquis is not uniform across the Energy Community region and across all areas, notably gas, electricity, oil, renewables, energy efficiency and environment.
The report notes the relatively faster advancement in the implementation of the electricity sector rules by Croatia, Montenegro and Serbia, compared to a slowing pace of reforms in Albania, the FYR of Macedonia, Moldova and Ukraine.
Progress in the implementation of the gas rules was moderate overall. However, little or no progress was achieved in some Contracting Parties, notably Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Deputy Director Dirk Buschle, who coordinates the Secretariat’s monitoring of the implementation status, stressed that “The Third Energy Package for Electricity and Gas presents a real opportunity for the Contracting Parties to catch up with the EU. Its adoption into national law by 1 January 2015 and subsequent implementation has to be the key priority in every country. To ensure this, the Secretariat will involve itself more deeply in the drafting of legislation than in the early days of the Energy Community. Further enforcement action might also be necessary.”
- Ukraine cannot pump gas at $500 per 1,000 cubic meters to underground storage facilities to ensure gas transit to EU, says Naftogaz head
- Cabinet proposes increasing gas prices for households by 40% from May 2015, by 20% from May 2016 and 2017
- Prodan asked Italians to think how to supply more gas to Ukraine
- Bulgaria and Turkey decided to support the South Stream?
- The US to invest in cutting-edge renewable energy technologies
- Impossible for Europe to stop buying Russian gas, says Putin
- Letter from President Barroso to President Putin
The assistance programme for the Ukrainian gas sector
Ukraine is important to Russian geopolitics, and its main focus is on gas pipes that encircle Europe and connect Russia with the West like an umbilical cord. Wojciech Jakóbik, independent analyst at Jagiellonian Institute, developed some guidelines for Europe and a plan for Ukraine to decrease dependence on Russian energy supplies.
Ukrainian gas transit and South Stream: more than meets the eye
Is the Ukrainian gas transit route still a risk? Will the construction of the South Stream pipeline further reduce the importance of Ukraine as a transit country? Or is there more at stake here than meets the eye? Julian Wieczorkiewicz and Arno Behrens from the Centre for European Policy Studies are looking for answers.
- Weekly analytical report: April 7 - 13, 2014
In this issue of the Weekly analytical report: - How Europe builds its energy policy towards Russia; - How will Ukraine answer to Russian gas pressure; - How Europe will support green energy; - What Ukraine lacks for successful energy efficiency policy; - How Ukrainian and European approaches towards shale gas development differ; - Does business still hold influence on state energy policy; - What will diversification of nuclear energy supplies will look like.